← Love Over MoneyA One Love Outdoors 501(c)(3) project

How We Score Companies

Our scoring is based on publicly verifiable facts, applied with honest editorial judgment. No algorithm. No black box. Just research and transparency.

The Karma Score (0–100)

The Karma Score is the average of five equally weighted categories, each scored from 0 to 100. A score of 100 represents a hypothetical ideal — no company scores perfectly. A score below 25 indicates significant documented harm.

The Five Categories — 20% each
🌿
Environment
Climate commitments vs. actual emissions. EPA violations. Fossil fuel investments. Supply chain environmental impact. Recycling and end-of-life programs.
🤝
Workers
Wages relative to industry. Benefits and healthcare coverage. Union relations. Layoff history. Workplace safety record. Employee reviews and culture.
🏡
Community
Investment in local economies. Charitable giving and advocacy. Support for small businesses and independent retailers. Civic engagement. Tax payment in communities served.
⚖️
Ethics
Legal and regulatory record. DOJ and SEC settlements. History of consumer harm. Product safety. Executive conduct. Conflicts of interest.
🔍
Transparency
Quality of public disclosure. Honest reporting of environmental and social data. Clarity of ownership structure. Political spending disclosure beyond legal minimums.
Karma Score = (Environment + Workers + Community + Ethics + Transparency) ÷ 5

The Transparency Score (0–100)

The Transparency Score measures how easy it is to trace a company's money trail — its political spending, ownership structure, and true financial relationships. Higher is better. A score of 100 means the company is fully transparent. A score of 0 means it is almost impossible to follow where the money goes.

76–100
Transparent
Easy to trace. Proactive disclosure. Full data available.
51–75
Semi-Transparent
Some gaps. Data exists but requires digging.
26–50
Low Transparency
Significant gaps. Complex structures obscure the picture.
0–25
Very Low
Hard to trace. Shell companies, offshore accounts, or minimal disclosure.

Editorial Scores, Not Algorithms

These scores are not produced by an algorithm. They are editorial assessments — human judgment applied to publicly verifiable facts. We document our reasoning in the "What They Actually Do" section of each company's profile so you can agree, disagree, or do your own research.

We try to be fair. A company with a genuinely great environmental record gets credit for it even if we disagree with other practices. A company that has made real improvements gets credit for that trajectory. Scores reflect conditions at the time of last review — not permanent verdicts.

We are not anti-business. We are pro-accountability. The goal is to help you make informed decisions with your money, not to tell you what to buy.

Local Shops, Online Retailers & Full Community Impact

When scoring retailers — especially in cycling and outdoor — we consider the full community impact of a business model, not just whether the product is good or the price is low.

A local bike shop employs a mechanic who knows your name, sponsors the Thursday night ride, donates to the trail crew, and keeps money circulating in your town. An online retailer that undercuts that shop on price by 15% may save one buyer $80 while destroying thousands of dollars of economic activity, community knowledge, and social infrastructure.

We net this out in Community and Ethics scores. A cheaper price that eliminates local jobs and expertise is not a neutral transaction — it has a cost that doesn't appear on the receipt. We try to make that cost visible.

This does not mean online retail is always bad. It means we score the whole picture: ownership, labor practices, community investment, and systemic impact — not just price.

Data Sources

Every material claim in a company profile is based on at least one of the following public sources. We do not use anonymous tips or unverified allegations.

FEC.gov — Federal Election Commission
Campaign finance disclosures: PAC contributions, individual donations, and independent expenditures by corporations and their executives.
OpenSecrets.org
Aggregated lobbying spend, revolving door data, and political spending analysis compiled from FEC and Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings.
SEC EDGAR
Institutional ownership (13F filings), annual reports (10-K), proxy statements, and material event disclosures (8-K) for publicly traded companies.
EPA Enforcement & Compliance
Environmental violations, fines, consent decrees, and Superfund site liability records.
DOJ / CFPB / FTC Settlement Records
Formal regulatory actions, consent orders, and settlement amounts — all public record.
Corporate Sustainability & Annual Reports
Company-published ESG reports, B Corp certifications, and shareholder letters — weighted appropriately given the source.
FARA — Foreign Agents Registration Act
Disclosures of relationships with foreign governments, state-owned enterprises, and foreign principals.
Verified news and court records
Investigative journalism from established outlets (Reuters, WSJ, NYT, ProPublica) and court filings for documented controversies.

Corrections & Updates

We welcome corrections. If you believe a score is wrong, a fact is outdated, or we've missed something important, please reach out. We will review and update scores when presented with credible, sourced information.

We will not change scores in response to pressure from companies, PR firms, or anyone with a financial interest in the outcome. Corrections require documented public sources, not assertions.

corrections@oneloveoutdoors.org
Love Over Money · A One Love Outdoors 501(c)(3) project